Відео

Do you mean the actors? Because neither of these figures were considered real legends in the field of economics, and neither get mentioned. Marx was also completely discredited.

​@@ExPwnerDas Kapital is the most cited book in economics.

@@rappakalja5295no it is not. Das Kapital is not even used in economics because it is complete made up garbage that has zero empirical support and its claims were refuted before Marx died. Only fringe weirdos would put it as reading in economics.

​@@ExPwner Yes, it is. The reason why Bourgeois economists (not the whole of economics) ignore Das Kapital is because it is a critique of capitalism and as such a critique of the privileges of the capitalist class. In other words, it goes against the status quo.

No it isn’t. There is no empirical evidence in it and it has no research value. There is no conspiracy against it.

A biased creator creates a biased video? Can't believe it.

@@rappakalja5295it’s not biased. It is accurate. Marx’s ideas were refuted including his idiotic labor theory of value. The fact that you are just too stupid and arrogant to accept this does not make them biased.

​@@ExPwnerDo you think the ideas of Mises are in the mouths of billions of workers around the globe? 😂 No, they aren't .

@@rappakalja5295and that is irrelevant and has nothing to do with the fact that Marx was refuted while Mises still hold true to this day. The ECP has never been overcome despite many socialist regimes trying to do so.

​@@ExPwner1. Marx has never been refuted 2. The ECP is an abstract theory which has not been present in any actually existing socialism. You can see that for yourself by looking at the economic history of socialist states. It is also relevant. Mises was a bourgeois economist and a lapdog for the rich, whereas Marx to this day inspires the people to rise up against oppression and create better systems without parasites leeching off of our labour.

Marx is the cornerstone of socialism for laying out the most solid critique of capitalism to date.

@@rappakalja5295 Seriously? What competitors are there? Hm. I issues of legitimacy for violence aside, that starts to make sense. I simply viewed socialism in the most constructive sense as adding buffers to capitalism, but if socialists view socialism as critics of capitalism, and if Marx is capitalism's sharpest critic, their defense of Marxists make sense, That said, if Marxisms is indeed intrinsic to the socialist movement, socialism itself must be broken, which is too bad, given I like, or could like, much, or most of socialism, but in case, so be it.

@@Noitartst Champ, adding "buffers" to capitalism is not socialism, because those buffers do not fix the issues inherent to capitalism. It is impossible to "fix" capitalism. Read Marx.

@@rappakalja5295 I read his manifesto, which was markedly short, and low on content, save calling for property distribution, which given Europe was still defeudalizing, I'm not going to bash him for,.but still is not a capitalist critique. As for Das Kapital, I understand it to be a hardcore explanation of how (Communism in theory) should work, but it isn't a critique of Capitalism. Okay. Where are the meat and potatoes, or are you going to tell me to re-read the manifesto?

@@Noitartst The full title of Capital is "Capital; a Critique of Political Economy". It is not a book about communism, it's a book that explains capitalism.

Please what true socialist or communist country has not failed. In fact the US is the most prosperous nation ever and it is capitalist, even China went essentially capitalist and is now the second largest economy in the world.

@@Sharknado18 please that is just some old propaganda talking points - but I don't blame you if you have never been outside of US or the only education you have is white washed American propaganda

@@Sharknado18 most prosperous but you can't see a doctor if your not rich :D:D I mean that's just pure brain rot - maybe learn about CTE that could have an impact on your world view you have developed

​@@Sharknado18The US is arguably the most prosperous nation in human history. And 40 million people are in permanent hunger every year. 650,000 people are homeless. How is it that a country which wastes more food than it needs to feed every mouth and a country which has more vacant houses than homeless people cannot solve these very simple problems? It's because of capitalism. A prospering capitalist class does not equal to a prospering society.

@@rappakalja5295 well it’s certainly more prosperous than the 11 million that starved to death in the USSR and the 40 million that starved to death in China, those numbers that he cited in the video were well after both the USSR and China opened up to more capitalist ideas with China nearly operating as a capitalist nation now.

And I take it you also noticed how Mises in his work about Socialism never actually discusses actually existing socialism?

🤮

@@ExPwner Bootlicker

@@s3m1f64nope. Commies are the biggest bootlickers out there. You lick the boot of the state. Go project elsewhere, clown

​@@ExPwner👢👅

@@rappakalja5295go project elsewhere dumbnuts

"All I've worked for could be given to somebody who can't get off their lazy ass and mooches off every government subsidy." Fella just flawlessly described every billionaire.

@@rappakalja5295 how does that describe billionaires many billionaires started companies that lead to jobs for thousands of people on top of the fact that most innovation comes from companies owned and run by billionaires.

@@Sharknado18 1. Innovation comes from workers, not billionaires who profit off of that innovation 2. Billionaires creating jobs is a meaningless argument when, as already said, that job is inherently exploitative. Feudal lords created jobs. Slavers created jobs. You're a grown adult man with a fully developed brain. You have no reason to bend over this passionately to the rich.

@@rappakalja5295jobs are not exploitative dipshit. Take your debunked Marxist nonsense elsewhere

​@@ExPwner Correct! Jobs are not inherently exploitative. What makes it exploitation is the private accumulation accruing from socialized wage labour 👍

Every one of mises books spits bars

If that were the answer it would have already worked, which it hasn't.

@@rappakalja5295yes it definitely has much more than communism which has failed to ever work. There is no perfect system eventually there will be a winner and loser.

Nope capitalism works and mixing in socialism only makes it worse

​@@ExPwnerCapitalism does work... in creating a wealthy minority who own the majority of the world's wealth.

@@rappakalja5295capitalism brings more equality than socialism so cope harder

Is it not an Economics Rap Battle?

@@agooddemoman8603 planned economies are not inherent to socialism nor did Marx write much about it

name one diffrence between socialism and communism

Marx used "socialism" and "comunism" as the same thing

​@@jaszczureki2637 The US has socialist polices, not communist ones

@@ethon6668 bro you don't even know what socialism means

@@jaszczureki2637 Public schooling is an example of a socialist policy. In a true capitalist nation with no socialist policies. there would be no public schooling.

We do not need socialism for healthcare or education. Both of those are awful under the monopolized control of the state and better and cheaper through an open market.

Do you think it's just coincidence that over 50% of new medicines and medical patents come from the U.S. because of a free market system? I agree that our healthcare system needs an overhaul, but socialist medicine would raise prices, not lower them. The problem is employer-based healthcare limits choice and forces people into terrible plans that are sold en masse to corporations. Ban employer based healthcare, and have companies give that money back to employees to make their own choices, and allow every insurance carrier to compete across every state and county. This would force insurance companies to compete for individual policy holders (just like Auto, Home, Car, and literally every other insurance) which fosters competition, increases choice, and lowers prices. The bureaucracy of insurance is the other problem, there is no explanation of the costs of medicines and procedures until usually after the procedure is done. Patients have no option to shop around and compare prices, and many doctor's offices refuse to take Medicare now because they don't even get reimbursed at cost for their services. And you want that for everyone? Education is even worse with public schools lagging behind literally every other educational option (homeschool, private, and charter) because in those school options they are forced to reach certain milestones and standards while also competing for students and tuition. Public schools waste ridiculous amounts of funding which is siphoned off by teacher's unions who make sure to keep teachers underpaid so they can continually demand more money. Best example is the city of Baltimore who pays over $21k per student in their school system and has literally the worst test scores in the nation, with a Valedictorian of one high school with a 1.9 GPA. Your takes are just bland talking points that have been proven wrong by empirical data for decades now.

​​@@thisismyyoutubecommentacco6302 How could it possibly be that defunded institutions are doing bad in the US but properly funded public institutions are doing great elsewhere? I also love how you think medical patents are a good thing. They are literally causing millions of unnecessary deaths every year, but hey, as long as the capitalist class gets their money!

​@@ExPwner"Healthcare is better and cheaper under the free market. What do you mean hundreds of millions of people don't have access to free healthcare because of it?"

@@rappakalja5295they are in no way “defunded” you dishonest turd

Mises is the greatest capitalist sorry bud

Ironic sentence seeing who your thumbnail is.

​@@slevinchannel7589 One Piece certainly is a story about the woes of authoritarianism-- interested to hear the contradiction between it and free-markets/liberty though..

​@@brez7029Equating free markets with liberty sure is a take.

@@rappakalja5295 I'm sorry??... free markets and liberty are two peas in the same pod and have been for centuries-- I'd love to hear about the centralized economy and liberty connection though lmfao

@@brez7029 Interesting. So when the US overthrew the Indonesian government to force capitalism into the country while murdering over a million people and installing one of the worst dictatorships of 20th century, it was actually liberty?